Huston Smith, Wise Elder
by Mary Davis (with selections from
The Way Things Are: Conversations with Huston Smith on the Spiritual Life
by Phil Cousineau)
At Mythic Journeys 2004 in the "Healing" seminar, some of the attendees object to being asked to speak
into a different kind of microphone in addition to the regular mike. The second microphone assists Huston Smith's hearing mechanism,
providing communication deep within his ear canal. It looks like a recording microphone and it has been referred to with loving kindness
in our other panel discussions as "a talking stick." To help people understand, Sobonfu Somé says, "We must honor our elder here."
I add, because no one else does, that this microphone allows this man who has taught so many of us for so many years — this
device allows him to hear our questions and comments. People begin to realize the importance of speaking into the device once they know
the reason, once they realize that this man is Huston Smith, who has given so much to us. They begin to see that we must give back to him
now.
Later in the discussion, this man, Huston Smith speaks of the kindness of people to him. He is deeply excited about meeting
another presenter, Theresa Coimbra McCaskey, a psychologist from Brasilia, Brazil, who experienced macular degeneration in her youth,
a condition he is currently experiencing as he ages. Hers resulted from a viral infection she contracted at the age of nineteen when she
was conducting research in the Amazon basin. His condition results from a hereditary tendency to lose vision in this way. She is teaching him,
talking with him about how to live with macular degeneration, to work with it and still be able to see, and at his eighty five years, he is
very excited about this!
Later during the discussion, he talks about the loss of his grandson to murder and the loss of his daughter to cancer. He speaks about
the experience of this incredible loss in his life, living through loss. And then I understand the sweetness I see in his field, in his face.
What an honor to meet him, this man who wrote the first book about comparative religion that I read when I was young. What
an honor to feel that sweetness, to feel his kiss on my cheek, to have the opportunity to show respect to him, to know that a wise elder
is present, especially as I move into the fullness of my wisdom in my mid-life. What a life model this man is — at 85 years, with various
physical weaknesses, he is still an intensely present, full participant!
I wrote the above paragraphs in June of 2004, after our Mythic Journeys Conference, for my personal journal. And then, just recently,
I found a note from Phil Cousineau, giving us permission to quote from the book he wrote in 2003 with Huston Smith, The Way Things Are
(University of California Press). When I found Phil's note, I had just returned from the Alliance for a New Humanity's Human Forum where
Gordon Wheeler, President of the Esalen Institute, told me that in February,
Esalen will host Huston Smith and one of Huston's daughters, Gael Ohlgren,
for a seminar, "Body and Mind." Both Huston and Gael (with her expertise in somatic practices) have taught through the years at Esalen, in addition
to their other teaching. In this workshop, they will "pretty much cover who we human beings are and what it means to live a human life."
So, honoring synchronicity and Huston Smith, here are several selections from The Way Things Are, Conversations With Huston Smith on the
Spiritual Life, edited and with a preface by Phil Cousineau. These selections are from Phil's interview, "Why Religion Matters Now More Than Ever"
(from pages 257 - 277).
They first discuss the impact of September 11, whether religion really had anything to do with the attack, and the fact that crimes have
been committed both by groups and nations in the name of religion and by groups and countries that are avowedly atheistic. Their conversation
continues, touching on life, art, modern culture, myth, religions, and the nature of reality itself.
Huston Smith, on pages 260 to 263 says,"…Religion is important because it is the standard-bearer for this incalculably important idea that
we human beings are not at the top of the hierarchy of intelligence in the total scheme of things. Heaven help us if we are. Religion insists that
there is a reality that is wiser, more powerful, more compassionate, and more mysterious than we can possibly imagine. I think it is right in this
claim, and that is why — again, on balance — I'm for it.
"Let me for a moment, put on my historian of religions cap and give you a quick 'Cook's Tour" of what the great wisdom traditions, as I
have come to think of them, say on this point. In East Asia, there was heaven and earth. Earth is this physical universe, and heaven is what
transcends it, and, as Confucius said, "Only heaven is great." In South Asia we have samsara (repeated cycles of birth, misery, and death), again,
this everyday world, and we have nirvana. I mean, what a signal that this is not all — there is something more to aspire to.
And of course, in the Abrahamic traditions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam there is this physical universe, its creator, Yahweh, God and Allah.
"The opposite of all this is materialism. Just last week I came upon an aphorism that states the contrast tellingly: "Materialism is a belief
that is starving for ideas." The point of this assertion is subtle, but if you spell it out logically, materialism reduces ideas to their physical underpinnings
— neuron firings. In technical parlance, an idea is an epiphenomenon — something that derives from what is less than it is, which
makes them significant in the nature of things. They're like foam on the beer, unimportant compared with the beer itself, metaphor for the
physical universe. Materialism is a deflating move. If we follow it to its logical end, there is no alternative to spiraling into cynicism and despair."
Cousineau: "Is it possible that that downward spiral can be described or imagined as the modern version of Plato's Cave? That
we are where we are today because we are trapped in the world of scientific materialism. Or we've become convinced — or been
hypnotized into believing — that the shadows on the wall are all there is? And if so, do you think Plato's allegory is still relevant today?"
Smith: "Absolutely. When I was conducting the Cook's Tour, I was going across the vast Eurasian continent, where civilizations
originated, and I included their philosophies along with their religions because in traditional cultures, there is little difference between the two.
But in the West, they've become bifurcated. I am so glad that you referred to Plato's cave because that allegory has been one of the two
foundations of Western civilization, the other being the account of Moses on Mount Sinai. Both of them involve an epiphany, an incursion, of
something greater than the mundane into history.
"The outline of Plato's allegory is very simple, which belies its profundity. Plato asks us to imagine prisoners chained inside a cave in such
a way that they can only face the wall, and that's the way their whole lives have been lived. All they have seen are the wall and the shadows,
but behind them are puppeteers who parade puppets and different objects, and the sun outside the mouth of the cave throws the shadows
of the puppets on the wall. All of this leaves the prisoners thinking the entire world is black and white and two-dimensional.
"Plato then says, what would happen if one of those prisoners — just imagine with me — if one of those prisoners were to
be unchained and turned around and led toward the opening of the cave? What does he see?
"First, he sees not just black and white, but Technicolor™. Hey, there's color, color in this world! And not just shadows, but
light! Light? What's that? Then he goes out into the enchanted garden of the world, and he understands that this light is coming from a source
— the sun that fills the world with light."
'Would he not be astonished?' Plato asks.
"Fair question, I would say. But now suppose he is led back, and he wants above all to share this world with his fellow prisoners. 'This isn't it at all,'
he says to them. 'It's out there!'
"Plato winds down the story by asking, What would they think? They would think he was crazy, and if he persisted in his opinions they would
kill him. Plato was not imagining this because that's exactly what they did to Socrates, who was his teacher, and had opened his eyes to realities
greater than those of the mundane world. If I may, I would like to move to the present and add an anecdote to this.
"This came my way this last spring. One of the great gratifications of a long teaching career is the many lasting friendships with students that
can develop, and this concerns an MIT student who was passing through Berkeley and told me something that I had never known about himself.
He told me his story of the allegory of Plato's cave, which took place back when he was a kid of about fourteen, in the Bronx, and as he put it didn't
know beans. One afternoon he was in Manhattan, and passing its public library, and decided to step in. He walked inside and was amazed how many
books there were in the world. All these stacks. He wandered down one, and his eye fell on the Dialogues of Plato. Plato? Who's he? Something
prompted him to reach for the book and he took it to a reading table, where the book fell open to the Seventh Book of the Republic, which begins
with the Allegory of the Cave.
"He found himself reading the story, and when he came to the end of it where Socrates asks, 'Would not someone who had seen the outdoors
and gone back into the cave - would that person not realize that the basic point of education is not to communicate facts and figures, but to open
student's eyes to vaster worlds they hadn't known existed?'
"When he came to that rhetorical conclusion of the Allegory, my student said he found that tears were streaming from his eyes. He said, 'You
know Huston, this was evidence of the longing inside me that there be something more than the streets of New York and the skyscrapers. Something
more than that.'"
Cousineau: "That's a beautiful story, Huston, a remarkable example of the timeless aspect of great myths. It doesn't matter when
they were written or compiled; when we find them it's as though they were recently written just for us. If it's true that it is the function of religion
and philosophy and art to help us turn our eyes from the shadows on the wall to the true light, the divine light of the sun, then what is the contribution
that Native American religion has made toward showing us a glint of that holy light? Are they showing us something of that original source? You
might remember our friend Gary Rhine asking, 'With all our centuries of history and accumulated knowledge, what is left for Indian people to tell us?'
Is there something about turning toward the light that American Indians can still teach us?"
Smith: "Not having been taken in by modernity's reductionism, Native Americans survive as a living witness to the transcendent that
is hidden in the ancestral memory of the rest of us. When I say ancestral, I have in mind this Turtle Island that is America's geographical ancestor.
Let me put it this way. Earlier I was talking about materialism as a philosophy that is starving for ideas. Native Americans were never materialists.
It would have seemed crazy, crazy to them. For them, the Great Spirit has always been the ultimate.
"The Winnebago medicine man Reuben Snake was my preeminent teacher from the Native Americans. I recall one of the things he taught me.
He told me, 'Huston, our teepees pointed east, and when we stepped out of them in the morning we would throw up our arms and shout "Aho!"'
I did it this morning. The first time I see the sun it infuses me with this inspiration, just like the sunlight brings the vegetation and the beauty and all life.
"I also remember what the Sufi mystic and poet Rumi once said: 'Knoweth thou not that the sun that thou seeth with thine eyes is but a
reflection of the sun behind the veil.' So even the sun is only a symbol and a metaphor for a deeper transcendent invisible source from which even it
springs, and it relays to us the glories of that source."
There is much more of interest and value in this interview and in this book. Because of our space limitations, we'll quote just one more exchange
from pages 265 - 268, when they discuss "the way things are!"
Cousineau: "For a long time now, I have been strangely moved by the way you have phrased the question you seem to feel is of
the utmost importance to ask of ourselves: 'Is there anything more important than the way things really are?' Is there?"
Smith: "I don't think so."
Cousineau: "Of course, it's possible to know how things may be for us, but is it possible to know in a definitive way how things really are?"
Smith: "Yes. Psychiatrists, therapists, counselors have come out on this subject. One of the greatest has said it very succinctly, that from the
innumerable hours spent talking with disturbed people, it comes to view that deeper than the craving for possession, deeper than the outreach for
sexual satisfaction, there is an even more fundamental craving in the human makeup. It is the craving for right orientation.
"I mean these people are confused. They don't know which way to go. They don't know what to do. They have the need for the sense that says,
'Yes, I am on the right track.' Now, this calls for a sense of the lay of the land. How can you be oriented if you do not know the territory? And that's
where the way things are kicks in to give us what we need."
Cousineau: "And yet, we live in a postmodernist time in which the Zeitgeist tells us that everything is relative, so that it is almost impossible
to see through the scrim of things to this ultimate reality, as you might say. Isn't it the task of 'seers' to see through the illusions of the times? So what
would you suggest that people do to help them see through the mistakes of our times?"
Smith: "Take a closer look at the history of the modern world that ushered in our mistakes. At the tail end of the Middle Ages, Europe
had stagnated, thinking that its outlook was close to the way things actually are. The Renaissance helped to get people out of that rut, which was good,
but then the Enlightenment took over and overrated the powers of reason. It thought that reason, working hand-in-glove with technology, was opening
the gates to unending progress. Postmodernism smashed that idea, but it has come up with nothing constructive to replace it with, and as Alfred North
Whitehead put the point vividly, if man cannot live by bread alone, still less can he live by disinfectants. Without something we truly believe in we are left
with relativism, and relativism is an unlivable philosophy that is in constant danger of spiraling into cynicism and despair. Moreover, absolute relativism isn't
even a coherent outlook, for in turning relativism into an absolute it has an internal contradiction built into it.
"There's another way to come at this issue. Deconstructionism is almost a synonym for postmodernism, and some things do need to be torn down
— demolition squads have their uses. But to set out to deconstruct everything? — which (as far as one can make out from its unreadable
prose) is what postmodernism seems to be bent on accomplishing. At minimum, postmodernists are out to tear down the Great Traditions of the great
civilizations, beginning with that of the West. We need to remember that it's a lot harder to create than to destroy. It can take months to make a beautiful
vase, but it can be smashed in an instant.
"Now to the other part of your question. How have I been able to escape this postmodern malaise? Well, I was lucky. It's public knowledge that
I was born to missionaries, in China, and while their outlook was parochial in many ways, what came through to me through my parents wasn't dogmatism
— we've got the truth and everybody else is going to hell, or moralisms like don't do this, that, and the other thing. What really came through to me
was this: We're in good hands and in gratitude for that fact it would be good if we bore one another's burdens. With all my gallivanting around the world,
I have yet to come upon a simple formula that surpasses that one, and it shielded me from relativism. Later, I came to realize that my own tradition,
Protestant Christianity, was not the only one, and I caught glimpses of the treasures — 'in them thar hills' — as prospectors for gold used to say.
Following up on those leads opened the world's traditions to me, so, as I say, I've been very fortunate.
"When I started looking around I was amazed. The first foreign tradition that came to me was the Vedanta, the philosophic branch of Hinduism.
In a way I won't go into here, I didn't so much seek it out as that it came my way. And when it did that it felt like a huge tidal wave of truth was
breaking over me. It took me about a decade to get on top of Vedanta, and then the tidal waves of other traditions scrambled me in much the same way.
"What kept me going was the marvelous, marvelous truths that kept coming my way. On my own I could never have gotten to come upon them.
Having then practiced Zen Buddhism with Daisetz Suzuki and the 'Dharma Bums,' what struck me most was the sublime unanimity behind all of these
traditions. Independently, they all came to the same basic conclusions as to the way things are. The great reward of my career has been the opportunity
it has given me to delve more deeply into these traditions which surfaced in this sublime unanimity."
(These selections from The Way Things Are are copyrighted material and reproduced here with written permission. This material may be
reproduced only with written permission.)
Read a review of
The Way Things Are by Dennis Patrick Slattery, Ph. D.
Read more by
Phil Cousineau at his website
Return to Passages Menu
Subscribe to the Passages e-newsletter
|